Here’s a bold statement: the boxing world is in for a shake-up, and it’s all because of one fighter’s unexpected move. Rolly Romero has thrown a curveball into the welterweight division by requesting an exemption to fight Manny Pacquiao instead of facing the long-awaited mandatory challenger, Shakhram Giyasov. But here’s where it gets controversial—is Romero dodging a tough fight, or is this just smart career maneuvering? Let’s break it down.
Shakhram Giyasov, the No. 1-ranked welterweight contender from Uzbekistan, has been patiently waiting for his shot at the WBA 147lb title. He even stepped aside to let Jaron “Boots” Ennis and Eimantas Stanionis unify the WBA and IBF titles, hoping to face the winner. Ennis emerged victorious, but instead of Giyasov getting his chance, Ennis decided to move up to 154lbs. This left Rolando “Rolly” Romero, holder of the lesser WBA regular title, as the full world titleholder. Giyasov remains the mandatory challenger, but Romero seems more interested in a high-profile bout with boxing legend Manny Pacquiao, who’s eyeing another welterweight title shot after his draw with Mario Barrios in July.
And this is the part most people miss: Eddie Hearn, Giyasov’s promoter, has revealed that Romero’s team has formally requested an exemption from the WBA to bypass the mandatory fight with Giyasov. Hearn isn’t having it. “Shakhram Giyasov has been waiting and waiting, and we believe the WBA should not allow that special exemption,” Hearn told BoxingScene. Giyasov’s team has also sent a letter to the WBA, strongly objecting to any special permit for Romero. Matchroom Boxing CEO Frank Smith echoed the sentiment, emphasizing that Giyasov just wants his shot at the title, regardless of the opponent.
But let’s step back for a moment—is Romero’s move a strategic career play or a questionable dodge? Fighting Pacquiao could elevate Romero’s profile significantly, but it also delays Giyasov’s long-overdue opportunity. Is it fair for Romero to prioritize a high-profile fight over fulfilling his mandatory obligations? Or should the WBA prioritize the integrity of its rankings and give Giyasov his shot? This debate isn’t just about boxing politics—it’s about fairness, patience, and the value of earning your place in the ring.
Meanwhile, in another corner of the boxing world, Paulie Malignaggi is skeptical about a potential Devin Haney vs. Conor Benn fight, believing Eddie Hearn might block it. But that’s a story for another day. For now, the focus is on Romero, Giyasov, and the WBA’s next move. What do you think? Should Romero get his exemption, or does Giyasov deserve his shot first? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments—this is one debate that’s sure to spark some heated opinions!
